a.
What
is a corandic?
A
corandic is an emurient grof with many fribs.
b.
What
does corandic grank from?
Corandic
granks from corite.
c.
How
do garkers excarp the tarances from the corite?
Garkers
excarp the trances by glarcking the corite and starping it in tranker-clarped
storbs.
d.
What
does the slorp finally frast?
The
slorp frasts a pragety, blickant crankle: coranda.
e.
What
is coranda?
Coranda
is a cargurt, grinkling corandic and borigen.
f.
How
is the corandic nacerated from the borigen?
The
corandic is nacerated from the borigen by means of loracity.
g.
What
do the garkers finally thrap?
The
garkers thrap a glick, bracht, glupous grapant, corandic.
It’s
interesting that without any idea of what this passage is about, I am able to
answer all seven of the questions that followed it. This really proves the point that questions
intended to check for comprehension in workbooks and standardized tests don’t
necessarily prove that students have understood what’s expected. An example that easily comes to mind is the
science workbooks that my student teaching school system used. The page was divided into two sections, one
had text, and the other side contained questions. The questions were just like those from the
example. The students did not have to
prove in any way that they learned the information; they could simply copy
sentences or parts of sentences to answer the questions. Students would look for keywords and copy the parts that seemed to answer the question.
In reality, most students could probably answer all of the questions
without actually reading the text.
This
also makes me think of a popular test-taking strategy that we often teach our
students to use. Before reading
passages, we encourage students to read through the questions to see what they
are going to be responsible for answering.
The purpose of this is to allow students to see familiar keywords in the
text. I personally think that this is a
wonderful strategy when students continue to actually read the text all the way
through. Unfortunately, though, I think
that many students read the questions and immediately browse the reading until
they find the keywords. Then they can
quickly choose a multiple choice answer that seems to answer the question. This is not proving that the students comprehend
the reading; it simply shows that the students can find information in the
text.
You made such a good point when you said students are only "recalling" information instead of comprehending anything. I never really knew how this would actually hinder a child's reading experience and growth.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with the fact that students read the questions and then look for key words instead of actually reading the text for comprehension and understanding. This is not doing our student any good. They are loosing the true meaning of learning: gaining understanding.
ReplyDelete